|
Monday - Saturday | 8am - 6pm
|
|
Thursday, May 31st, 2012 2:36 pm
Murphy Jones LLP has filed a civil complaint in the District Court of Nevada on behalf of nurse Jessica Rice, RN against Sunrise Hospital Medical Center, et. al., for Defamation, Wrongful Termination, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Negligence, Conspiracy, Civil RICO violations and Fraud in relation to an ongoing dispute arising from Sunrise Hospital’s allegations of “intentional patient harm” against infant patients in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).
On July 2, 2010, two-month old baby Miowne Obote died from complications stemming from a disrupted catheter line. Sunrise Hospital requested that the Las Vegas Metro Police Dept. investigate fourteen (14) incidents of disrupted catheters, and the subsequent police investigation has not led to any criminal charges being filed. The Clark County Coroner has admitted that his initial determination that the death was a homocide was not supported by any County Coroner investigation and instead he relied on the conclusion of the allegedly flawed analysis by an expert that Sunrise Hospital hired.
Subsequently, both Ms. Rice, and another NICU nurse were summarily suspended from nursing practice by the Nevada Board of Nursing. After an independent investigation, the Nevada Board of Nursing found no evidence of wrongdoing and reinstated both nurses’ licenses. (“Fired Sunrise nurse files suit,” Harasim 5/31/12, Las Vegas Review-Journal.)
Sunrise Hospital terminated the employment of both of nurses based on an alleged policy violation. The nurses’ union, (Service Employees International Union of Nevada; i.e., SEIU NV), filed a grievance against the hospital for wrongful termination. In December 2011, the Federal Arbitrator found in favor of Ms. Rice and issued an Order requiring Sunrise Hospital to reinstate Ms. Rice to her former position in the NICU and awarded her back pay. To date, Sunrise Hospital has refused to comply with the Arbitrator’s decision. The nurses’ union (SEIU) has filed a lawsuit in Federal Court seeking to enforce the Arbitrator’s decision.
The civil Complaint filed by Murphy Jones LLP on behalf of Ms. Rice on May 29, 2012, alleges that Sunrise Hospital was made aware of “at least thirteen (13) incidents involving intravenous catheter lines, in which the catheters became separated in two (2) of the incidents…interrupting the flow of fluids through the catheter. After two (2) catheter incidents resulted in harm or potential harm to infants in May 2010, Defendants intentionally, and/or with reckless disregard for the truth and/or negligently began a course of conduct that focused aggressively on employee Plaintiff Jessica Rice as the presumed suspect for the cause of the catheter incidents, labeled her as a ‘person of interest,’ terminated her from her employment without just cause, exposed her to public contempt, ridicule and disgrace and induced evil opinion of her.”
Filed under: Administrative Law, California Healthcare, Firm News, Healthcare Law, Medical Board of California, Nevada Healthcare, Nevada Politics, Nursing, Nursing Union, Occupational Licensing Defense, Occupational Licensing Defense Lawyer, Personal Injury Law, State Licensing Board Defense
by
Kevin Murphy
Tags: Board of Nursing Attorney, Board of Nursing Defense Attorney, Consipracy, Defamation, Fraud, Healthcare Discipline Defense, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, kathleen murphy jones, Kevin C. Murphy, las vegas nursing board, Murphy Jones LLP, murphyjoneslaw.com, Negligence, nevada state board of nursing, Nursing Board Attorney, Nursing Discipline, personal injury attorney in las vegas, Personal injury attorney in san diego, Personal injury lawyer in san diego, RICO Violations, Service Employees International Union, Sunrise Hospital, Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, Sunrise Hospital Catheter, Wrongful TerminationNo Comments »
RSS 2.0
Tuesday, February 21st, 2012 4:55 pm
Democrat and Republican senators are seeking a national investigation regarding state medical boards' disciplinary actions. Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Charlie Grassley (R-Iowa) have submitted a request letter to the director of the Office of the Inspector General for the Dept. of Health seeking a federal investigation into state medical boards.
The senators' letter states, "With the adoption of advanced medical technologies...and an increase in physicians holding licenses in two or more states, it is becoming increasingly important that states issue timely board actions and coordinate licensure actions to protect the public from unqualified or marginally proficient practitioners." (Walker, MedPage Today 2/21/12). The senators cite a Public Citizen, a consumer organization, report which finds that less then one-half of the 10,672 doctors listed in the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) have been disciplined by their licensing state medical board.
A federal investigation could have wide ranging ramifications relating to increased disciplinary actions being filed and increased delays in state medical board administrative proceedings. The attorneys at Murphy Jones LLP are monitoring the situation and will continue to report on the investigation request as new information becomes available.
Filed under: Administrative Law, California Medical Board, Healthcare Law, Legal Insights, Medical Board of California, Nevada Healthcare, Nevada Politics, Nursing, Occupational Licensing Defense, Occupational Licensing Defense Lawyer, State Licensing Board Defense
by
Kevin Murphy
Tags: Healthcare License Attorney, Medical Board Attorney, Medical Board Lawyer, Medical Board of California Defense Attorney, Medical Board of California Defense Lawyer, medical board of Nevada, Medical License Lawyer, professional license defense, State Medical Boards Federal InvestigationNo Comments »
RSS 2.0
Tuesday, September 13th, 2011 4:25 pm
The California Board of Chiropractic Examiners has recently adopted Informed Consent requirements which compel chiropractors to obtain patients' consent after being fully informed of any potential risk of harm to the patient in relation to medical treatment. The new legislation takes effect on October 7, 2011, and will require informed consent both orally and in writing prior to the performance of chiropractic clinical care. Violation of the new law will constitute unprofessional conduct which will very likely lead to the Board of Chiropractic Examiners to initiate disciplinary proceedings against practitioners who fail to adhere to the requirements. (Dynamic Chiropractic, California Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 9/12/11)
Filed under: Administrative Law, california board of chiropractic examiners, California Healthcare, Healthcare Law, Occupational Licensing Defense Lawyer, State Licensing Board Defense
by
Kevin Murphy
Tags: Board of Chiropractic Examiners Attorney, Board of Chiropractic Examiners Lawyer, california board of chiropractic examiners defense attorney, california board of chiropractic examiners defense lawyer, Facebook Healthcare Attorney, Healthcare Discipline Defense, Personal injury lawyer in san diego2 Comments »
RSS 2.0
Tuesday, April 19th, 2011 12:41 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has taken no action on Virginia Attorney General's request to expedite the resolution of the pending Healthcare Reform Legislation litigation, in attempt to skip appellate judicial review despite President Obama's objection. "High court takes no action on Va. health care case" (Associated Press, 4/19/11)
Filed under: California Healthcare, California Politics, Civil Litigation, Healthcare Law, Nevada Healthcare, Nevada Politics, Nursing, Occupational Licensing Defense, Occupational Licensing Defense Lawyer, State Licensing Board Defense
by
Kevin Murphy
Tags: Board of Chiropractic Examiners Attorney, Board of Chiropractic Examiners Lawyer, Board of Dental Examiners Attorney, Board of Dental Examiners Defense Attorney, Board of Dental Examiners Defense Lawyer, board of dental examiners lawyer, Board of Nursing Attorney, Board of Nursing Defense Attorney, Board of Nursing Defense Lawyer, Board of Nursing Lawyer, Board of Occupational Therapy Defense Attorney, Board of Pharmacy Attorney, Board of Pharmacy Defense Lawyer, Board of Pharmacy Lawyer, california board of chiropractic examiners defense attorney, california board of chiropractic examiners defense lawyer, California Board of Nursing Defense Lawyer, California Board of Occupational Therapy Attorney, California Board of Occupational Therapy Defense Lawyer, California Board of Occupational Therapy Lawyers3 Comments »
RSS 2.0
Monday, July 12th, 2010 1:18 pm
The California Board of Medicine makes Accusations against physicians available to the public. Check Doctor License status here. The Medical Board's search system has been touted as one of the best in the country [Dahlberg, Sacramento Bee 7/12/10]. Patients seeking to learn more about their doctors/potential doctors can easily view discipline Accusations lodged against physicians, which can lead to a more informed decision.
However, medical professionals, healthcare practitioner advocacy groups and defense attorneys protest the disclosure of Accusations prior to any final action being taken against a physician. The exposure of Accusations, prior to any final action being taken, creates a situation where a doctor can be judged on the basis of unproven complaints or allegations.
The ultimate goal is to protect the public, and allow patients to access a practitioners' history, while simultaneously protecting physician privacy and due process rights under the law. The disclosure of unsubstantiated Accusations has the potential to mis-inform patients and ruin reputations of healthcare professionals, but also allows patients to make more informed decisions based on the nature of the allegations. It is a "Catch 22" for everyone involved, but the physicians bear the brunt of the detriment to their careers and profession if patients make judgements based on untruthful accusations.
Filed under: Administrative Law, California Healthcare, California Politics, Healthcare Law, Legal Insights, Medical Malpractice, State Licensing Board Defense
by
Kevin Murphy
Tags: attorney medical malpractice, board of medicine, Board of Medicine Attorney, Board of Medicine Defense Attorney, Board of Medicine Defense Lawyer, board of medicine lawyer, Board of Medicine License Lawyer, california board of medicine, California State Board of Nursing; Cal. Nursing Board Discipline, Facebook Healthcare Attorney, Facebook Healthcare Lawyer, Facebook Medical Attorney, Healthcare Discipline Defense, las vegas board of medicine, Las Vegas Board of Medicine Attorney, Las Vegas Board of Medicine Lawyer, las vegas healthcare attorney, License Attorney, License Lawyer, Medical Board Accusation, Medical Board Attorney, Medical License Attorney, medical license discipline defense, Medical License Lawyer, Nevada Board of Medicine Lawyer, San Diego Board of Medicine Attorney, San Diego Board of Medicine Lawyer, san diego medical malpractice attorney, Twitter Healthcare Attorney, twitter.com/NurseAttorneys1 Comment »
RSS 2.0
Thursday, April 29th, 2010 7:33 am
Nurse Practitioners prime candidates for Primary Caregivers in the face of Dr. Shortages:
Nurse practitioners are going to play an integral role as primary caregivers, filling the void left by massive physician shortages throughout the United States. (Stuart, 4/28/10). The Association of Medical Colleges reports that the U.S. may be facing a 150,000 doctor shortage by 2025. (Chapman, 4/18/10 Chicago Tribune "Nursing our way out of a doctor shortage"). The American Medical Association estimates the doctor shortage to equal a deficit of 85,000 by the year 2020. Regardless, the data is evident that doctors are facing extraordinary understaffing difficulties at the same time they are facing astronomical increases in their patient loads.
28 States currently have introduced legislation designed to expand the role of advanced practice nurses to that of Primary Caregiver. ("Fewer doctors may lead to more patients seeing nurse practitioners") Several states already allow independent advanced nursing practice, and many other states are currently seeking to fill the void left by a lack of physicians. Oklahoma is currently seeking to expand nurse practitioners' roles (Coburn 4/21/10 "Officials look to PAs, nurse practitioners for aid in physician shortage"), as well as Oregon, Washington, California. (Johnson AP 4/14/10 "Shortage may mean a bigger role for nurse practitioners"), New York (Gordon 4/25/10 "Take advantage, New York, of our nurse practitioners)
Nurse practitioners, or "advanced practice nurses," are highly trained registered nurses who usually possess a masters degree or a doctorate in a specialized nursing discipline. Nurse practitioners have advanced education, experience and training in the diagnosis, treatment and management of common illnesses (Parker, ehow "Nurse Practitioners & Patient Education). The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners indicates that 95% of advanced practice nurses already prescribe medications, writing an estimated 19 prescriptions per day.
Healthcare Reform impact on doctor shortages:
32 Million more Americans are anticipated to be included in the healthcare patient pool as a result of the recently passed healthcare reform legislation. (4/14/10 "Use nurse practitioners to reduce doctor shortage") This large number of additional patients will further exacerbate physician shortages across the country. Medicare typically reimburses nurse practitioners at a lower rate than doctors are reimbursed, which could end up saving millions of dollars at a time when our economy is in dire need of reducing government spending. Maryland columnist Jay Hancock explains that nurse practitioners should be allowed to practice completely independently from physician supervision, and that they are already allowed to practice independently in Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Washington D.C. (Hancock, The Baltimore Sun "Md. should make nurse practitioners independent").(Stuart, 4/28/10 "Nurse practitioners key to unlocking healthcare access").
Doctors are beginning to mount opposition to such measures arguing that allowing nurse practitioners to usurp physicians' roles will place patients at risk. Dr. Daniel Carey, President of the Medical Society of Virginia, has stated, "When you talk about increasing the scope of practice of nurse practitioners...we have problems with that. They are not acknowledging the significant difference in training." (Smith 4/26/10 "Health reform may expand non-physician roles") The American Medical Assoc. (AMA) President James Rohack has said, "increasing the responsibility of nurses is not the answer to the physician shortage." (Bagg, 4/19/10) "Doctors have shown up in white coats to testify against nurse practitioner bills. The AMA, which supported the national health care overhaul, says that a doctor should supervise an NP at all times and in all settings. Just because there is a doctor shortage, the AMA argues, is no reason to put nurses in charge and endanger patients." Associated Press; Maher 4/19/10 "Hey Nursie!" The Battle over Letting Nurse Practitioners Provide Primary Care"). One critic claims "doctors went to their medical schools for a reason, and allowing a nurse to take over their roles is a short-sighted way of solving these shortages." (Joyner, 4/18/10 "Let doctors, not nurses, doctor")
Nurse practitioners have accumulated their own support, and are beginning to form their own professional associations across the nation. (Gallaher, 4/22/10 "Whatcom County nurse practitioners form new professional association"). Univ. of Southern Indiana Professor Daniel Lucky describes the difference between Nurse Practitioners and Physicians as not being education or professional qualifications but instead it is their healthcare approach, "NP practice is based on the nursing model of care -- not the medical approach...Nursing teaches us that we should not reduce human beings to mere signs and symptoms, place a disease on someone, give them a pill and send them off. As nurses we are trained to look at the entire patient from a holistic perspective and then, actively partner with the patient and family to not only correct problems, but also enhance optimal health. Nursing care places the patient -- not the provider -- as the central focal point." (Beaulieu, 4/14/10 "Expanding roles of nurse practitioners stir controversy"). In fact, the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation recently released a report recommending immediate removal of legal and financial barriers preventing advanced practice nurses from providing primary care. (Glenn, 4/20/10 "Nurse practitioners new primary care providers?") Nurse practitioners assert that they are not trying to infringe on doctors' specialities, but are a critical resource in providing patient care in this time of dire need. (West, 4/27/10 "Not looking to replace doctors") In actuality, nurse practitioners do not commit malpractice as often as physicians or, at least, they are not sued as often -- only 1.4% of Nurse Practitioners are named as a primary defendant in medical malpractice lawsuits. (Stuart, 4/28/10 "Nurse practitioners key to unlocking health care access")
Conclusion -- Let the Nurses Doctor!
Murphy Jones LLP represent nurses in licensing, discipline and malpractice matters and are intimately familiar with the nursing profession, and have full confidence in nurses' abilities to render superb healthcare to patients.As healthcare attorneys, we support the expansion of nurse practitioners' primary care roles provided that they do not usurp the proper functions of physicians. Physicians are adept with dealing with advanced diseases and treatments for complex disorders; whereas advanced practice nurses are more than capable of diagnosing common diseases and disorders, and prescribing medications to treat patients. A 2000 study published by the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that patients of nurse practitioners recovered as well or better than patients under the supervision of a primary care physician. A main benefit of expanding nurse practitioners' roles is that they manage patients with current illnesses and simultaneously teach patients how to stay healthy. This is exactly the type of care America needs if we are going to improve the overall health of our citizens and simultaneously lower health care costs. Often times, patient satisfaction is higher among patients receiving care from an advanced practice nurse as opposed to a licensed physician. (British Medical Journal 4/6/10 "Systemic review of whether nurse practioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors") So with happier and healthier patient results coupled with reduced costs and government spending, allowing nurse practitioners to use their knowledge helping patients while reducing the doctor shortage voids is common sense and good business judgment.
As the old adage says, "Doctors diagnose, Nurses HEAL!" So why not let nurse practitioners do both?!
View related videos:
Filed under: Administrative Law, California Board of Pharmacy, California Healthcare, California Politics, Healthcare Law, Legal Insights, Medical Malpractice, Nevada Healthcare, Nevada Politics, Nursing, Nursing Association
by
Kevin Murphy
Tags: Administrative Law, Advanced Practice Nurse Attorney, attorney medical malpractice, Board of Chiropractic Examiners Attorney, Board of Chiropractic Examiners Lawyer, board of nursing california, board of nursing san diego, Board of Pharmacy Attorney, Board of Pharmacy Lawyer, Board of Registered Nursing Attorney, Board of Registered Nursing Defense, Board of Registered Nursing Defense Attorney, california board of medicine, California board of registered nursing, California Nurse, California Nurses Association, California state board of nursing, California State Board of Nursing; Cal. Nursing Board Discipline, Direct Supervision of Nurses, Doctor Shortage, Facebook Healthcare Attorney, Facebook Medical Attorney, Healthcare Discipline Defense, Healthcare Reform Effect on Nursing, Healthcare Reform Impact on Nurse Practitioners, Healthcare Reform Impact on Nurses, Healthcare Reform Impact on Nursing, las vegas nursing board, Medical Board Attorney, Medical Board Lawyer, nevada board of nursing, Nevada Board of Registered Nursing, Nevada Board of Registered Nursing Attorney, nevada state board of nursing, Nurse Practitioner Attorney, Nurse Practitioner Business Attorney, Nurse Practitioners, Nurse Practitioners business attorney, Nurse Practitioners expanding role, Nurse Practitioners Lawyer, Nursing Board Attorney, Nursing Discipline, Personal injury attorney in san diego, Politics, state boards of nursing, Twitter Healthcare Attorney, twitter.com/HealthAttorneys18 Comments »
RSS 2.0
Sunday, February 21st, 2010 1:20 pm
California Assemblywoman Mary Hayashi has publicly criticized the California Board of Pharmacy for supporting legislation that allegedly conflicts with the Board of Pharmacy’s duty to regulate pharmacy operations and it’s duty to protect the public. As healthcare attorneys who defend pharmacists in disciplinary investigations and proceedings before the Office of Administrative Hearings, we are very concerned and interested in preserving impartiality of the Board of Pharmacy during the development of legislation making it easier for the public to get flu shots.
The Board of Pharmacy is endowed with the power to regulate the profession, discipline pharmacists who violate their duties, and to protect the public. The legislation in question is designed to expand the ability of pharmacists, especially independent operators, to provide flu vaccinations to Californians. Assemblywoman Hayashi has publicly stated, “Their (the Board of Pharmacy) legislative actions on behalf of the profession they are supposed to regulate have raised questions about industry influence, which compromises their role as a regulator.” Assemblywoman Hayashi has introduced legislation, Assembly Bill 2104 (AB 2104), designed to require the California Board of Pharmacy to secure approval from the California Department of Consumer Affairs before sponsoring legislation.
Currently, none of the California Boards (Board of Medicine, Board of Registered Nursing, Board of Dental Examiners, Board of Occupational Therapy, Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, Board of Chiropractic Examiners, etc.) are required to seek approval by the Dept. of Consumer Affairs prior to sponsoring legislation. Other lawmakers criticize Assemblywoman Hayashi”s AB 2104 for only focusing on the Board of Pharmacy. “What’s good for one board should be good for all the boards.” said Bob Stern, President of the Center for Governmental Studies.
Assemblywoman is a former member of the California Board of Registered Nursing, which opposed the flu vaccine legislation, Assembly Bill 977 (AB 977) in 2009. Many nurses are still worried about the procedures for providing flu vaccinations to the public. AB 977 passed the California State Assembly in January 2010 and is currently pending action in the California State Senate.
For a full account see: Sacramento Bee article
Review legislation at: California State Assembly legislative inquiry
Filed under: Administrative Law, California Board of Pharmacy, California Healthcare, California Politics, Healthcare Law, Legal Insights, Nursing, Nursing Association, State Licensing Board Defense
by
Kevin Murphy
Tags: Administrative Law, attorney medical malpractice, Board of Pharmacy Attorney, Board of Pharmacy Discipline Defense, Board of Pharmacy San Diego, california board of medicine, california board of occupational therapy, California Board of Pharmacy Flu Shot, California board of registered nursing, california board of vocational nursing and psychiatric technicians, California Flu Shot Legislation, California Pharmacist, California State Board of Pharmacy, California State Board of Pharmacy Discipline, Facebook Healthcare Attorney, Facebook Healthcare Lawyer, Facebook Medical Attorney, Facebook Personal Injury Attorney, Flu Shot Legislation, Healthcare Discipline Defense, Personal injury attorney in san diego, Personal injury lawyer in san diego, Pharmacist License Defense, Pharmacy Board Attorney, Pharmacy Board Discipline, Politics, san diego medical malpractice, san diego medical malpractice attorney, Twitter Healthcare Attorney, Twitter Pharmacist, Twitter Pharmacy Board, twitter.com/NurseAttorneysNo Comments »
RSS 2.0
Tuesday, July 21st, 2009 9:51 pm
Dr. Howard Dean wants to speak directly with nurses and doctors about the role they must play during this critical phase in new healthcare system legislative process. The conference, which is co-sponsored by the American Nurses Association, is intended to discuss elements of the House and Senate bills and how they will impact health care professionals.. Murphy Jones LLP healthcare attorneys will attend the tele-conference in effort to contribute to the development of legislation that furthers interests of the nursing profession. All nurses and people wanting to learn more about the actions each individual can take to make nurses’ needs a legislative and national priority are encouraged to attend and contribute.
The conference call will take place July 22, 2009, at 6:30 pm EST. In order to complete registration and review additional details related to the national conference call visit:
http://www.rnaction.org/site/PageServer?pagename=EmergencyCallwithDrDean
Filed under: Administrative Law, California Healthcare, California Politics, Firm News, Healthcare Law, Nevada Healthcare, Nevada Politics, Nursing, Nursing Association
by
Kevin Murphy
Tags: attorney medical malpractice, board of nursing california, board of nursing san diego, California board of registered nursing, california nursing license, California state board of nursing, Healthcare Reform, Healthcare Reform Effect on Nursing, Healthcare Reform Impact on Nurses, Healthcare Reform Impact on Nursing, las vegas medical malpractice, las vegas nursing board, medical malpractice law firms, nevada board of nursing, nevada state board of nursing, Personal injury attorney in san diego, Personal injury lawyer in san diego, san diego medical malpractice, san diego medical malpractice attorney, state boards of nursing6 Comments »
RSS 2.0
Sunday, July 19th, 2009 7:27 pm
Murphy Jones LLP has created a Twitter account generating tweets providing up to the minute news and developments relating to professional practice of medicine, the nursing profession, State Boards of Nursing, medical malpractice litigation impacting professionals’ rights and responsibilities, and other interesting legal developments in the healthcare industry. With our administrative law healthcare attorneys staying informed of trends, changes in the law and case precedent, we post information relevant to medical practitioners and the legal industry.
Visit us at http://twitter.com/NurseAttorneys , and start following today to keep informed about recent developments.
Filed under: Administrative Law, California Healthcare, California Politics, Civil Litigation, Firm News, Healthcare Law, Medical Malpractice, Nevada Healthcare, Nevada Politics, Nursing, Nursing Association, Personal Injury Law, State Licensing Board Defense
by
Kevin Murphy
Tags: attorney medical malpractice, board of nursing california, board of nursing san diego, California board of registered nursing, california nursing license, California state board of nursing, https://twitter.com/NurseAttorneys, las vegas medical malpractice, las vegas nursing board, medical malpractice law firms, nevada board of nursing, nevada state board of nursing, Personal injury attorney in san diego, Personal injury lawyer in san diego, san diego medical malpractice, san diego medical malpractice attorney, state boards of nursing, Twitter, Twitter Healthcare Attorney, Twitter Healthcare Defense, Twitter Medical, Twitter Nurse, Twitter Nursing Board, twitter.com/NurseAttorneysNo Comments »
RSS 2.0
|
|
|
|